Why I Still Prefer Unity: It's All About Real Estate

10 Aug 2015 linux

I've been pretty good about not becoming a open source pundit. But today I feel like writing something useless.

My laptop's ssd crapped out yesterday so I spent the day restoring backups and installing operating systems. I've been using Ubuntu for a few years now, so I thought it would be great to revisit Gnome and see how the 3.x development is coming along, maybe even switch back.

Nope.

There are many things I don't like, but like many blog posts written before this one, I'm going to bitch and moan about a minute detail until the horse is well beyond dead.

Screen real estate. Gnome's devs claim that Gnome Shell is minimalist and efficient, but I beg to differ. Here is an image comparing Gnome and Unity, using their default themes, and a terminal in the upper left hand corner of the screen:

'Unity Vs Gnome'

The screenshots were taken using the same resolution. Gnome's gluttons window decorations make me sick. They create a ton of wasted space, whereas Unity's much thinner ones double as the menu bar. I can squeeze like, 2 more lines in the terminal using Unity!

What's more, if I maximize, Unity integrates the entire window border into the top panel, freeing yet more space.

Sorry Gnome, but I'm still not impressed. The whole experience still feels like it's designed for a tablet. For example, the "swipe up ^" animation on GDM is just plain offensive! No thanks, not for my laptop at least. Maybe I'll run Gnome on an old smartphone.

Back to Unity, again.

comments powered by Disqus