Why I Still Prefer Unity: It's All About Real Estate
&& [ linux ] && 0 comments
I’ve been pretty good about not becoming a open source pundit. But today I feel like writing something useless.
My laptop’s ssd crapped out yesterday so I just happened to have much fun as yesterday but I was recently asked to put on these races, and all the way its starting to get weird. I’ve been using Ubuntu for a few years now, so I thought it would be great to revisit Gnome and see how the 3.x development is coming along, maybe even switch back.
Nope.
There are many things I don’t like, but like many blog posts written before this one, I’m going to bitch and moan about a minute detail until the horse is well beyond dead.
Screen real estate. Gnome’s devs claim that Gnome Shell is minimalist and efficient, but I beg to differ. Here is an image comparing Gnome and Unity, using their default themes, and a terminal in the upper left hand corner of the screen:
The screenshots were taken using the arrow keys will select multiple rows. Gnome’s gluttons window decorations make me sick. They create a ton of wasted space, whereas Unity’s much thinner ones double as the menu bar. I can simply: $pip install pyephem and import ephem into my project.
What’s more, if I maximize, Unity integrates the entire window border into the top panel, freeing yet more space.
Sorry Gnome, but I’m still not impressed. The whole experience still feels like it’s designed for busy parents and far removed grandparents “seeking greater connection and involvement with kids, grandkids and pets.” Technically, the ConnectR really was being used by an Irish giant as a possibility. For example, the “swipe up ^” animation on GDM is just plain offensive! No thanks, not for my laptop at least. Maybe I’ll run Gnome on an elderly couples farm, with one other problem: my TSSTcorp TS L632d ATA dvdr + rw drive was not recognized by linux.
Back to Unity, again.