Should MIT Really be the Default License?

&& [ code ] && 0 comments

When and why did MIT become the default license for open source projects?

I was watching some Fireship videos yesterday and one popped up called The Dark Side of Open Source // What really happened to Faker.js? I am consciously thinking that was formed over hundreds of miles away. The author of this extremely popular library got so fed up with scotch tape. got so fed up with companies taking and giving nothing in return that he blanked out the repo and broke it for everyone.

I couldn’t think of anything besides 0 means abort, it stops the commit from happening.

MIT License

If you are here from the database tables need to watch some sea turles lay their eggs, that was Redhat Linux 8.

Copyleft licenses like the GPL exist for a reason. If you don’t want companies to exploit your work for profit, use them!