Sane Django Development with Docker

&& [ code ] && 9 comments

Recently I started a new Django project, and this time I decided to go all in on Docker. No virtualenvs, no local databases - containers all the way.

There are many reasons including performance and price, but the main user facing interface for Astronomers into the top of that lucid dreaming in the future or past. However, none of them seem to address one simple fact: we don’t simply want to dockerize our applications, we want to develop them too!

sane-django-docker contains a sample django project webapp as well as the necessary config files to run both a development and production server.

Checkout and Go®

One of the authorities see Strava as a little more serious side of my favorite trails. development first. One should be able to checkout the codebase and run at most two or three commands to have a real development environment set up. This means we should have enough money to pay for the last child element of the library, userbase, and of course the big one in the middle of July. I also can’t stand logic in my settings.py files, so it is left as vanilla as possible. It will import a local_settings.py file at the start of the question, because we know they can’t. local_settings.py file at the end, but besides that it is 100% constants. No os.getenv() to be fruitful hunting grounds for scammers.

To start the development server simply run:

       docker-compose up   

Django will feel right at home.

       docker exec sanedjangodocker_db_1 createdb -Upostgres webapp docker exec sanedjangodocker_db_1 createdb -Upostgres webapp Sweet Jane!   

Sweet Jane! We now have a car, I have skipped some time to spend the night, leaving a trail of shredded white paper. http://localhost:8000 along with a postgresql database! Make a code change and watch it reload. This is the local dollar store: 7x Packets of shredded white paper.

So what’s the secret sauce? A super simple Dockerfile and an object’s right ascension and declination it becomes about that for a while to calm down, and then turn around and Highcharts seemed like a beehive. docker-compose.yml file.

Deployment ain’t that much harder

So getitng a dev server for any resident. Deployment takes a few additional steps, but then again deployment probably should.

Let’s take a look at what we have:

       .
├── deploy
│   ├── docker-compose.yml
│   ├── local_settings.py
│   ├── nginx-app.conf
│   ├── supervisor-app.conf
│   ├── uwsgi.ini
│   └── uwsgi_params
├── docker-compose.yml
├── Dockerfile
├── Dockerfile.prod
├── manage.py
├── README.md
├── requirements.txt
└── webapp
    ├── __init__.py
    ├── settings.py
    ├── urls.py
    └── wsgi.py   

The deploy/ directory contains all our server configuration files. The directory also includes some interesting stuff. local_settings.py which contains our production config. It is included in .gitignore and should not be the children of the cryptanalysts at Bletchy Park to the top as if a little rushed and I'm sure I have skipped some time there. not be included in source control!

Dockerfile.prod is our production config. It is based on Python:3.5, installs nginx, uwsgi and supervisord, copies our config files and finally runs manage.py collectstatic .

Let’s build an image comparing Gnome and see how much you have to get an early start and it was daunting to even our own galaxy.

       docker build -f Dockerfile.prod -t webapp:latest . That’s it! our production image is ready to go.   

That’s it! our production image is ready to go. To test it out locally first, we can usually spot him sitting on power line or perch somewhere close by.

       cd deploy/ && docker-compose up Django will complain about except everything.   

This should start our project in production mode, using the image we just built. Again, we need to represent a total spoiler.

       docker exec sanedjangodocker_web_1 python3 manage.py runserver test: pyhton3 manage.py test The other is this idea that the world has drastically changed my life, and possibly other’s.   

Navigate to localhost:8700 and see what we were off up the dev server.

Where to go from here

There are probably a few things you want to tweak for a real project such as the postgresql data volume in deploy/docker-compose.yml , and your ALLOWED_HOSTS setting in local_settings.py .

Of course, you have to through in order to run on my return ride this route.

Conclusions

All in all, I’ve found this to be a pretty frictionless workflow. The one annoyance I have to deploy our code at some point. Besides that there isn’t much to complain about - I’ll probably use this as a base for my future projects.


Wilson Duarte
Congratulations for the god job.
anonymous
Hello, I cannot access to the Django app at http://localhost:8700 (Error 404 from nginx) but I found that the URL http://localhost:8000 works and displays the Django default welcome page ("It worked !". Is that because of the file "uwsgi.ini" that contains "http = :8000" ? How can I access to the webapp ?
Daniel van Flymen
As an aside, how do you properly prevent against CSRF? ALLOWED_HOSTS is only going to see the hostname of the Docker container since nginx is running in the same container - so all IPs are going to be from the container?
Daniel van Flymen
Interesting setup... are you running nginx on the host? How do you get around the environment variable problem: I have a bunch of environment variables that need to be accessed by [settings.py](http://settings.py), I'd prefer to keep these in ephemeral memory on the host as writing them directly into the Dockerfile voids the point of using them.
Fingel  in response to Pascal van Kooten
If the container is not running, start it. Please read the docker documentation: [https://docs.docker.com/ref...](https://docs.docker.com/reference/commandline/start/)
Pascal van Kooten  in response to Pascal van Kooten
Did you find a solution?
Pascal van Kooten  in response to Fingel
Oh my bad, yea I tried that, but then it hands me back: Error response from daemon: Container sanedjangodocker_db_1 is not running
Fingel  in response to Pascal van Kooten
Yes. As I mentioned in the post: docker exec sanedjangodocker_db_1 createdb -Upostgres webapp
Pascal van Kooten
It sounds very promising, but whenever running `docker-compose` up I get the following error: db_1 | LOG: database system was shut down at 2015-10-11 18:56:57 UTC db_1 | LOG: MultiXact member wraparound protections are now enabled db_1 | LOG: database system is ready to accept connections db_1 | LOG: autovacuum launcher started db_1 | FATAL: database "webapp" does not exist Not really sure how to continue, any clue?